NHS clinical process automation
They told you what to change. We change it, every day.
Your trust has already paid for the review and accepted the findings. What was never bought was the operational capacity to act on them. We take one accepted recommendation and turn it into software that runs daily — and produces the evidence as a by-product.
Placeholder — wired to the delivery platform at launch.
The argument, in three parts
Why a first conversation is worth thirty minutes
The recommendation nobody can staff
Accepted at board, sat in a plan for two years, still on the risk register. Not because it was wrong, but because delivering it needs a person doing a task every day and there isn’t one.
How we take that on Two — the priceWe built the engines ourselves
No platform licence floor, no per-page reading fee, no day rate. That is the only reason a first engagement can cost twelve thousand pounds rather than a hundred and fifty.
The arithmetic Three — the safetyOne bot watches another
The system doing the work is not the only system checking it. Four independent records per action, a chain that cannot be quietly edited, and a machine that stops rather than guessing.
How the audit worksWhat we fix
Six problems, each with a fixed price and a known duration
Every pilot sits under the direct-award threshold and completes in four to eight weeks. Prices differ because the work differs.
| Scenario | Pilot | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Closing consultancy gaps — the review happened, nothing changed | £12,000 | 4–6 weeks |
| Paper to structured data — scanning produced pages, clinicians need facts | £25,000 | 6–8 weeks |
| Manual process replacement — a person retyping between two screens | £18,000 | 5–6 weeks |
| Regulator evidence — reconstructed the week before an inspection | £20,000 | 5–7 weeks |
| EPR migration data quality — go-live happened, the data did not all arrive | £15,000 | 4 weeks |
| Estate map and silent failure — nobody knows what stopped working | £15,000 | 4–6 weeks |
Twenty years of it
We started by moving clinical data, not by automating it
weAutomate began as DICOM and HL7 integration engineers, building teleradiology software for NHS trusts and the operators who serve them. Our systems have run inside NHS estates since 2011.
Automation came later, and for an unremarkable reason: we kept watching skilled people retype things a machine had already read.
What carried over was the discipline. Clinical data is unforgiving — a record filed against the wrong patient is worse than one not filed at all. That is why our software holds rather than guesses.
| Since | What we built |
|---|---|
| 2011 | Autorouter — teleradiology suite across four NHS sites |
| 2014 | Radicube — managed service, 190,000 reports delivered |
| 2019 | RADLite — DICOM transfer and reporting, still in production |
| 2020 | Our own OCR and automation engines |
| 2026 | Live PACS migration [figures pending approval] |
If it turns out we are not the answer, we will say so
Every first engagement runs on your own data, so there is nothing to argue with afterwards. If it shows the problem is not the one we solve, we will tell you — and we will not sell you anything.